Loading...
Murad Nutrient-Charged Water Gel scores 9.4/9.8 vs NIVEA Body Lotion Rich Nourishing at 6.9/9.8. Murad Nutrient-Charged Water Gel wins for active ingredients.
Murad Nutrient-Charged Water Gel takes this one, winning 3 of 5 attributes.
Scores last verified: April 2026
58 unique
21 unique
Where Murad Nutrient-Charged Water Gel really shines is active ingredient strength, scoring 9.8 compared to NIVEA Body Lotion Rich Nourishing's 2.0. Its formula features Ceramide Np, Ceramide Ap, and Ceramide Eop in high positions, signalling meaningful concentrations.
Hydration Efficacy is another area of separation. Murad Nutrient-Charged Water Gel scores 9.8 here versus 6.3 for NIVEA Body Lotion Rich Nourishing. That difference comes down to how each formula is built — the ingredient list tells the story.
Murad Nutrient-Charged Water Gel brings Ceramide Np, Ceramide Ap, and Ceramide Eop as actives, while nIVEA Body Lotion Rich Nourishing relies on Tocopherol and Tocopheryl Acetate. Both approaches have merit, but the positioning and supporting ingredients make the difference.
Murad Nutrient-Charged Water Gel is better if you have
NIVEA Body Lotion Rich Nourishing is better if you have
Murad Nutrient-Charged Water Gel comes in at premium pricing with a 9.4 score, which is solid value at that tier.
Murad Nutrient-Charged Water Gel wins this comparison with a meaningfully stronger ingredient profile and overall score.
Based on ingredient analysis, Murad Nutrient-Charged Water Gel scores higher overall. See the full score breakdown above for details on each attribute.
Yes, they share common ingredients. Check the ingredient face-off section above for a detailed comparison.
The key differences are in their active ingredients and formulation approach. Check the attribute battle above for a detailed breakdown.
Some links on this site are affiliate links. We may earn a commission from purchases made through our links, at no extra cost to you. This helps us keep Gracie free and independent.
© 2026 Gracie. All rights reserved. Data sourced from Open Beauty Facts (ODbL) and EU CosIng.