Loading...
Medicube Zero Pore Pad 2.0 scores 8.2/9.8 vs NIVEA Masque exfoliant lissant at 5.8/9.8. Medicube Zero Pore Pad 2.0 wins for active ingredients.
Medicube Zero Pore Pad 2.0 takes this one, winning 5 of 5 attributes.
Scores last verified: April 2026
28 unique
16 unique
Where Medicube Zero Pore Pad 2.0 really shines is active ingredient strength, scoring 6.3 compared to NIVEA Masque exfoliant lissant's 2.0. Its formula features Niacinamide, Allantoin, and Gluconolactone in high positions, signalling meaningful concentrations.
Hydration Efficacy is another area of separation. Medicube Zero Pore Pad 2.0 scores 7.4 here versus 4.6 for NIVEA Masque exfoliant lissant. That difference comes down to how each formula is built — the ingredient list tells the story.
Medicube Zero Pore Pad 2.0 brings Niacinamide, Allantoin, and Gluconolactone as actives, giving it an edge in targeted skincare benefits.
Medicube Zero Pore Pad 2.0 is better if you have
NIVEA Masque exfoliant lissant is better if you have
Medicube Zero Pore Pad 2.0 comes in at mid-range pricing with a 8.2 score, which is solid value at that tier.
Medicube Zero Pore Pad 2.0 wins this comparison with a meaningfully stronger ingredient profile and overall score.
Based on ingredient analysis, Medicube Zero Pore Pad 2.0 scores higher overall. See the full score breakdown above for details on each attribute.
Yes, they share common ingredients. Check the ingredient face-off section above for a detailed comparison.
The key differences are in their active ingredients and formulation approach. Check the attribute battle above for a detailed breakdown.
We may earn a commission from purchases made through our links, at no extra cost to you. This helps us keep Gracie free and independent.
Some links on this site are affiliate links. We may earn a commission from purchases made through our links, at no extra cost to you. This helps us keep Gracie free and independent.
© 2026 Gracie. All rights reserved. Data sourced from Open Beauty Facts (ODbL) and EU CosIng.