✶

I'm From Rice Toner vs Tirtir Milk Skin Ton… — Which Is Better? | Gracie

Products
Ingredients
Brands
K-Beauty
Blog
How We Score

Gracie
/Compare
/I'm From Rice Toner
/vs
/Tirtir Milk Skin Toner

I'm From Rice Toner vs Tirtir Milk Skin Toner

Tirtir Milk Skin Toner scores 8.2/9.8 vs I'm From Rice Toner at 6.9/9.8. Tirtir Milk Skin Toner wins for hydration.

Head to head

I'm From

Rice Toner

tonermid-range

6.9

Buy at Olive Young

Compare

Best Moisturisers
Best Serums
Best Cleansers
Best SPF

Ingredients

Niacinamide
Retinol
Hyaluronic Acid
Salicylic Acid

K-Beauty

K-Beauty Hub
K-Beauty Moisturisers
K-Beauty Serums
K-Beauty Sunscreens

About

Methodology
About Us
All Brands
All Products

Gracie

Honest skincare intel. No jargon, no gatekeeping — just the ingredients decoded.

Tirtir

Milk Skin Toner

tonermid-range

8.2

Score comparison

Tirtir Milk Skin Toner takes this one, winning 3 of 5 attributes.

I'm From wins 0

Tied 2

Tirtir wins 3

9.0

I'm From

Tirtir

Ingredient face-off

36% overlap

12I'm From

8Shared

22Tirtir

Only in I'm From Rice Toner

4 unique

Oryza Sativa (Rice) Extract Methylpropanediol Betaine Sodium Hyaluronate

Shared ingredients

8 in common

Water Glycerin Niacinamide 2-Hexanediol Panthenol Allantoin Adenosine Ethylhexylglycerin

Only in Tirtir Milk Skin Toner

14 unique

Butylene Glycol Lactobacillus Ferment Propanediol Dimethicone Carbomer Dipotassium Glycyrrhizate Tromethamine Disodium Edta Hyaluronic Acid Ceramide Np+4 more

Why Tirtir Milk Skin Toner comes out ahead

Where Tirtir Milk Skin Toner really shines is hydration efficacy, scoring 8.1 compared to I'm From Rice Toner's 5.3. With Glycerin, Butylene Glycol, and Panthenol in its top ingredients, Tirtir Milk Skin Toner delivers stronger moisture-binding capability.

Active Ingredient Strength is another area of separation. Tirtir Milk Skin Toner scores 5.3 here versus 3.7 for I'm From Rice Toner. That difference comes down to how each formula is built — the ingredient list tells the story.

Tirtir Milk Skin Toner brings Niacinamide, Adenosine, and Allantoin as actives, while i'm From Rice Toner relies on Niacinamide, Allantoin, and Adenosine. Both approaches have merit, but the positioning and supporting ingredients make the difference.

Best for your skin type

I'm From Rice Toner is better if you have

Sensitive skin — the low-irritation formula keeps things gentle
Anyone who prefers clean, well-vetted formulations

Tirtir Milk Skin Toner is better if you have

Sensitive skin — the low-irritation formula keeps things gentle
Dry or dehydrated skin that craves moisture, thanks to Glycerin
Anyone who prefers clean, well-vetted formulations

Value comparison

Both sit in the mid-range bracket, so value comes down to formulation quality. Tirtir Milk Skin Toner gets the nod here with its 8.2 overall score — you're getting more for a similar outlay.

Our verdict

✶ Our verdict

+1.3 lead

Tirtir Milk Skin Toner wins this comparison with a meaningfully stronger ingredient profile and overall score.

6.9I'm From

8.2Tirtir

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: I'm From Rice Toner or Tirtir Milk Skin Toner?

Based on ingredient analysis, Tirtir Milk Skin Toner scores higher overall. See the full score breakdown above for details on each attribute.

Do I'm From Rice Toner and Tirtir Milk Skin Toner share ingredients?

Yes, they share common ingredients. Check the ingredient face-off section above for a detailed comparison.

What's the main difference between I'm From Rice Toner and Tirtir Milk Skin Toner?

The key differences are in their active ingredients and formulation approach. Check the attribute battle above for a detailed breakdown.

Full analysis: I'm From Rice Toner→Full analysis: Tirtir Milk Skin Toner→

We may earn a commission from purchases made through our links, at no extra cost to you. This helps us keep Gracie free and independent.

Some links on this site are affiliate links. We may earn a commission from purchases made through our links, at no extra cost to you. This helps us keep Gracie free and independent.