Glossier Futuredew vs The Ordinary Buffet
Head to head
VS
Loading...
The Ordinary Buffet takes this one, winning 3 of 5 attributes.
13 unique
Where The Ordinary Buffet really shines is active ingredient strength, scoring 8.4 compared to Glossier Futuredew's 3.3. Its formula features Palmitoyl Tripeptide-1, Palmitoyl Tetrapeptide-7, and Allantoin in high positions, signalling meaningful concentrations.
Hydration Efficacy is another area of separation. The Ordinary Buffet scores 8.7 here versus 6.3 for Glossier Futuredew. That difference comes down to how each formula is built — the ingredient list tells the story.
The Ordinary Buffet brings Palmitoyl Tripeptide-1, Palmitoyl Tetrapeptide-7, and Allantoin as actives, while glossier Futuredew relies on Niacinamide. Both approaches have merit, but the positioning and supporting ingredients make the difference.
Glossier Futuredew is better if you have
The Ordinary Buffet is better if you have
At mid-range pricing with a score of 7.1, Glossier Futuredew is a decent pick. The Ordinary Buffet sits at the budget level with a 8.8 score — the higher investment pays off in formulation quality.
The Ordinary Buffet wins this comparison with a meaningfully stronger ingredient profile and overall score.
Based on ingredient analysis, The Ordinary Buffet scores higher overall. See the full score breakdown above for details on each attribute.
Yes, they share common ingredients. Check the ingredient face-off section above for a detailed comparison.
The key differences are in their active ingredients and formulation approach. Check the attribute battle above for a detailed breakdown.
We may earn a commission from purchases made through our links, at no extra cost to you. This helps us keep Gracie free and independent.
Some links on this site are affiliate links. We may earn a commission from purchases made through our links, at no extra cost to you. This helps us keep Gracie free and independent.
© 2026 Gracie. All rights reserved. Data sourced from Open Beauty Facts (ODbL) and EU CosIng.