Loading...
Ole Henriksen Strength Trainer Peptide Boost Moisturizer scores 9.4/9.8 vs Drunk Elephant Lala Retro Whipped Cream at 8.1/9.8. Ole Henriksen Strength Trainer Peptide Boost Moisturizer wins for active ingredients.
Ole Henriksen Strength Trainer Peptide Boost Moisturizer takes this one, winning 2 of 5 attributes.
Scores last verified: April 2026
16 unique
16 in common
54 unique
Where Ole Henriksen Strength Trainer Peptide Boost Moisturizer really shines is active ingredient strength, scoring 9.8 compared to Drunk Elephant Lala Retro Whipped Cream's 5.4. Its formula features Niacinamide, Acetyl Hexapeptide-1, and Acetyl Hexapeptide-8 in high positions, signalling meaningful concentrations.
Hydration Efficacy is another area of separation. Ole Henriksen Strength Trainer Peptide Boost Moisturizer scores 9.8 here versus 8.0 for Drunk Elephant Lala Retro Whipped Cream. That difference comes down to how each formula is built — the ingredient list tells the story.
Ole Henriksen Strength Trainer Peptide Boost Moisturizer brings Niacinamide, Acetyl Hexapeptide-1, and Acetyl Hexapeptide-8 as actives, while drunk Elephant Lala Retro Whipped Cream relies on Plantago Lanceolata Leaf Extract, Ceramide Np, and Ceramide Ap. Both approaches have merit, but the positioning and supporting ingredients make the difference.
Drunk Elephant Lala Retro Whipped Cream is better if you have
Ole Henriksen Strength Trainer Peptide Boost Moisturizer is better if you have
Both sit in the premium bracket, so value comes down to formulation quality. Ole Henriksen Strength Trainer Peptide Boost Moisturizer gets the nod here with its 9.4 overall score — you're getting more for a similar outlay.
Ole Henriksen Strength Trainer Peptide Boost Moisturizer wins this comparison with a meaningfully stronger ingredient profile and overall score.
Based on ingredient analysis, Ole Henriksen Strength Trainer Peptide Boost Moisturizer scores higher overall. See the full score breakdown above for details on each attribute.
Yes, they share common ingredients. Check the ingredient face-off section above for a detailed comparison.
The key differences are in their active ingredients and formulation approach. Check the attribute battle above for a detailed breakdown.
We may earn a commission from purchases made through our links, at no extra cost to you. This helps us keep Gracie free and independent.
Some links on this site are affiliate links. We may earn a commission from purchases made through our links, at no extra cost to you. This helps us keep Gracie free and independent.
© 2026 Gracie. All rights reserved. Data sourced from Open Beauty Facts (ODbL) and EU CosIng.