Loading...
Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 scores 8.4/9.8 vs Hera Hera Black Cushion SPF34 PA++ at 7.8/9.8. Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 wins for active ingredients.
Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 edges ahead, winning 2 of 5 attributes.
Scores last verified: April 2026
6 unique
14 in common
4 unique
Where Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 really shines is active ingredient strength, scoring 6.3 compared to Hera Hera Black Cushion SPF34 PA++'s 3.9. Its formula features Centella Asiatica Extract, Niacinamide, and Madecassoside in high positions, signalling meaningful concentrations.
Ingredient Transparency is another area of separation. Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 scores 8.8 here versus 7.8 for Hera Hera Black Cushion SPF34 PA++. That difference comes down to how each formula is built — the ingredient list tells the story.
Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 brings Centella Asiatica Extract, Niacinamide, and Madecassoside as actives, while hera Hera Black Cushion SPF34 PA++ relies on Niacinamide and Adenosine. Both approaches have merit, but the positioning and supporting ingredients make the difference.
Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 is better if you have
Hera Hera Black Cushion SPF34 PA++ is better if you have
Both sit in the premium bracket, so value comes down to formulation quality. Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 gets the nod here with its 8.4 overall score — you're getting more for a similar outlay.
Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 edges ahead with a slightly stronger formulation, but Hera Hera Black Cushion SPF34 PA++ is still a solid pick.
Based on ingredient analysis, Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 scores higher overall. See the full score breakdown above for details on each attribute.
Yes, they share common ingredients. Check the ingredient face-off section above for a detailed comparison.
The key differences are in their active ingredients and formulation approach. Check the attribute battle above for a detailed breakdown.
We may earn a commission from purchases made through our links, at no extra cost to you. This helps us keep Gracie free and independent.
Some links on this site are affiliate links. We may earn a commission from purchases made through our links, at no extra cost to you. This helps us keep Gracie free and independent.
© 2026 Gracie. All rights reserved. Data sourced from Open Beauty Facts (ODbL) and EU CosIng.