Loading...
Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 scores 8.4/9.8 vs Fotoprotector ISDIN Fotoprotector ISDIN Gel Cream 30 SPF at 6.2/9.8. Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 wins for hydration.
Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 takes this one, winning 3 of 5 attributes.
Scores last verified: April 2026
17 unique
25 unique
Where Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 really shines is hydration efficacy, scoring 8.9 compared to Fotoprotector ISDIN Fotoprotector ISDIN Gel Cream 30 SPF's 4.6. With Glycerin, Butylene Glycol, and Panthenol in its top ingredients, Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 delivers stronger moisture-binding capability.
Active Ingredient Strength is another area of separation. Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 scores 6.3 here versus 2.2 for Fotoprotector ISDIN Fotoprotector ISDIN Gel Cream 30 SPF. That difference comes down to how each formula is built — the ingredient list tells the story.
Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 brings Centella Asiatica Extract, Niacinamide, and Madecassoside as actives, while fotoprotector ISDIN Fotoprotector ISDIN Gel Cream 30 SPF relies on Retinyl Palmitate. Both approaches have merit, but the positioning and supporting ingredients make the difference.
Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 is better if you have
Fotoprotector ISDIN Fotoprotector ISDIN Gel Cream 30 SPF is better if you have
Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 comes in at premium pricing with a 8.4 score, which is solid value at that tier.
Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 wins this comparison with a meaningfully stronger ingredient profile and overall score.
Based on ingredient analysis, Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 scores higher overall. See the full score breakdown above for details on each attribute.
Yes, they share common ingredients. Check the ingredient face-off section above for a detailed comparison.
The key differences are in their active ingredients and formulation approach. Check the attribute battle above for a detailed breakdown.
We may earn a commission from purchases made through our links, at no extra cost to you. This helps us keep Gracie free and independent.
Some links on this site are affiliate links. We may earn a commission from purchases made through our links, at no extra cost to you. This helps us keep Gracie free and independent.
© 2026 Gracie. All rights reserved. Data sourced from Open Beauty Facts (ODbL) and EU CosIng.