Loading...
OleHenriksen Banana Bright+ Instant Glow Moisturizer edges ahead, winning 1 of 5 attributes.
16 unique
8 in common
43 unique
Where OleHenriksen Banana Bright+ Instant Glow Moisturizer really shines is active ingredient strength, scoring 8.4 compared to CeraVe mosisturizing's 5.4. Its formula features Niacinamide, Ascorbic Acid, and Tocopherol in high positions, signalling meaningful concentrations.
OleHenriksen Banana Bright+ Instant Glow Moisturizer brings Niacinamide, Ascorbic Acid, and Tocopherol as actives, while ceraVe mosisturizing relies on Ceramide Np, Ceramide Ap, and Ceramide Eop. Both approaches have merit, but the positioning and supporting ingredients make the difference.
CeraVe mosisturizing is better if you have
OleHenriksen Banana Bright+ Instant Glow Moisturizer is better if you have
OleHenriksen Banana Bright+ Instant Glow Moisturizer edges ahead with a slightly stronger formulation, but CeraVe mosisturizing is still a solid pick.
Based on ingredient analysis, OleHenriksen Banana Bright+ Instant Glow Moisturizer scores higher overall. See the full score breakdown above for details on each attribute.
Yes, they share common ingredients. Check the ingredient face-off section above for a detailed comparison.
The key differences are in their active ingredients and formulation approach. Check the attribute battle above for a detailed breakdown.
We may earn a commission from purchases made through our links, at no extra cost to you. This helps us keep Gracie free and independent.
Some links on this site are affiliate links. We may earn a commission from purchases made through our links, at no extra cost to you. This helps us keep Gracie free and independent.
© 2026 Gracie. All rights reserved. Data sourced from Open Beauty Facts (ODbL) and EU CosIng.