Loading...
CeraVe Hydrating cream-to-foam cleanser takes this one, winning 2 of 5 attributes.
55 unique
5 in common
Where CeraVe Hydrating cream-to-foam cleanser really shines is hydration efficacy, scoring 7.2 compared to Duke Cannon Hydrating Face Wash's 3.4. With Glycerin, Sodium Pca, and Sodium Hyaluronate in its top ingredients, CeraVe Hydrating cream-to-foam cleanser delivers stronger moisture-binding capability.
Active Ingredient Strength is another area of separation. CeraVe Hydrating cream-to-foam cleanser scores 6.9 here versus 4.0 for Duke Cannon Hydrating Face Wash. That difference comes down to how each formula is built — the ingredient list tells the story.
CeraVe Hydrating cream-to-foam cleanser brings Ceramide Np, Ceramide Ap, and Ceramide Eop as actives, while duke Cannon Hydrating Face Wash relies on Lactic Acid. Both approaches have merit, but the positioning and supporting ingredients make the difference.
CeraVe Hydrating cream-to-foam cleanser is better if you have
Duke Cannon Hydrating Face Wash is better if you have
CeraVe Hydrating cream-to-foam cleanser wins this comparison with a meaningfully stronger ingredient profile and overall score.
Based on ingredient analysis, CeraVe Hydrating cream-to-foam cleanser scores higher overall. See the full score breakdown above for details on each attribute.
Yes, they share common ingredients. Check the ingredient face-off section above for a detailed comparison.
The key differences are in their active ingredients and formulation approach. Check the attribute battle above for a detailed breakdown.
We may earn a commission from purchases made through our links, at no extra cost to you. This helps us keep Gracie free and independent.
Some links on this site are affiliate links. We may earn a commission from purchases made through our links, at no extra cost to you. This helps us keep Gracie free and independent.
© 2026 Gracie. All rights reserved. Data sourced from Open Beauty Facts (ODbL) and EU CosIng.