✶

BIODERMA Atoderm Int… vs Ole Henriksen Streng… — Which Is Better? | Gracie

Products
Ingredients
Brands
K-Beauty
Blog
How We Score

Gracie
/Compare
/BIODERMA Atoderm Intensive Baume
/vs
/Ole Henriksen Strength Trainer Peptide Boost Moisturizer

BIODERMA Atoderm Intensive Baume vs Ole Henriksen Strength Trainer Peptide Boost Moisturizer

Ole Henriksen Strength Trainer Peptide Boost Moisturizer scores 9.4/9.8 vs BIODERMA Atoderm Intensive Baume at 6.9/9.8. Ole Henriksen Strength Trainer Peptide Boost Moisturizer wins for active ingredients.

Head to head

BIODERMA

Atoderm Intensive Baume

moisturisermid-range

6.9

Buy at Amazon

Compare

Best Moisturisers
Best Serums
Best Cleansers
Best SPF

Ingredients

Niacinamide
Retinol
Hyaluronic Acid
Salicylic Acid

K-Beauty

K-Beauty Hub
K-Beauty Moisturisers
K-Beauty Serums
K-Beauty Sunscreens

About

Methodology
About Us
All Brands
All Products

Gracie

Honest skincare intel. No jargon, no gatekeeping — just the ingredients decoded.

✶

Ole Henriksen

Strength Trainer Peptide Boost Moisturizer

moisturiserpremium

9.4

Score comparison

Ole Henriksen Strength Trainer Peptide Boost Moisturizer takes this one, winning 2 of 5 attributes.

BIODERMA wins 0

Tied 3

Ole Henriksen wins 2

6.9BIODERMA

+2.5vs

9.4Ole Henriksen

Scores last verified: April 2026

Attribute battle

Hydration Efficacy

Ole Henriksen WINS

4.7

9.8

BIODERMA

Ole Henriksen

Irritation Risk

TIE

9.5

BIODERMA

Ole Henriksen

Active Ingredient Strength

Ole Henriksen WINS

3.1

9.8

BIODERMA

Ole Henriksen

Ingredient Transparency

TIE

8.5

BIODERMA

Ole Henriksen

Formulation Safety

TIE

9.0

BIODERMA

Ole Henriksen

Ingredient face-off

9% overlap

20BIODERMA

6Shared

70Ole Henriksen

Only in BIODERMA Atoderm Intensive Baume

14 unique

Aqua/Water Helianthus Annuus (Sunflower) Seed Oil Mineral Oil (Paraffinum Liquidum)Canola Oil Glyceryl Stearate Peg-100 Stearate Mannitol Rhamnose Laminaria Ochroleuca Extract Sodium Cocoyl Glutamate+4 more

Shared ingredients

6 in common

Glycerin Cetearyl Alcohol Niacinamide Xylitol Carbomer Phenoxyethanol

Only in Ole Henriksen Strength Trainer Peptide Boost Moisturizer

64 unique

Aqua/Water/Eau Propanediol Dicaprylyl Carbonate Methylpropanediol Stearyl Alcohol Mangifera Indica (Mango) Seed Butter Acetyl Hexapeptide-1 Acetyl Hexapeptide-8 Acetyl Tetrapeptide-2

Why Ole Henriksen Strength Trainer Peptide Boost Moisturizer comes out ahead

Where Ole Henriksen Strength Trainer Peptide Boost Moisturizer really shines is active ingredient strength, scoring 9.8 compared to BIODERMA Atoderm Intensive Baume's 3.1. Its formula features Niacinamide, Acetyl Hexapeptide-1, and Acetyl Hexapeptide-8 in high positions, signalling meaningful concentrations.

Hydration Efficacy is another area of separation. Ole Henriksen Strength Trainer Peptide Boost Moisturizer scores 9.8 here versus 4.7 for BIODERMA Atoderm Intensive Baume. That difference comes down to how each formula is built — the ingredient list tells the story.

Ole Henriksen Strength Trainer Peptide Boost Moisturizer brings Niacinamide, Acetyl Hexapeptide-1, and Acetyl Hexapeptide-8 as actives, while bIODERMA Atoderm Intensive Baume relies on Niacinamide and Laminaria Ochroleuca Extract. Both approaches have merit, but the positioning and supporting ingredients make the difference.

Best for your skin type

BIODERMA Atoderm Intensive Baume is better if you have

Sensitive skin — the low-irritation formula keeps things gentle
Anyone who prefers clean, well-vetted formulations

Ole Henriksen Strength Trainer Peptide Boost Moisturizer is better if you have

Sensitive skin — the low-irritation formula keeps things gentle
Dry or dehydrated skin that craves moisture, thanks to Glycerin
Targeting specific concerns like aging or uneven tone — Niacinamide does the heavy lifting

Value comparison

At mid-range pricing with a score of 6.9, BIODERMA Atoderm Intensive Baume is a decent pick. Ole Henriksen Strength Trainer Peptide Boost Moisturizer sits at the premium level with a 9.4 score — the higher investment pays off in formulation quality.

Our verdict

✶ Our verdict

+2.5 lead

Ole Henriksen Strength Trainer Peptide Boost Moisturizer wins this comparison with a meaningfully stronger ingredient profile and overall score.

6.9BIODERMA

✶

9.4Ole Henriksen

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: BIODERMA Atoderm Intensive Baume or Ole Henriksen Strength Trainer Peptide Boost Moisturizer?

Based on ingredient analysis, Ole Henriksen Strength Trainer Peptide Boost Moisturizer scores higher overall. See the full score breakdown above for details on each attribute.

Do BIODERMA Atoderm Intensive Baume and Ole Henriksen Strength Trainer Peptide Boost Moisturizer share ingredients?

Yes, they share common ingredients. Check the ingredient face-off section above for a detailed comparison.

What's the main difference between BIODERMA Atoderm Intensive Baume and Ole Henriksen Strength Trainer Peptide Boost Moisturizer?

The key differences are in their active ingredients and formulation approach. Check the attribute battle above for a detailed breakdown.

Full analysis: BIODERMA Atoderm Intensive Baume→Full analysis: Ole Henriksen Strength Trainer Peptide Boost Moisturizer→

We may earn a commission from purchases made through our links, at no extra cost to you. This helps us keep Gracie free and independent.

Some links on this site are affiliate links. We may earn a commission from purchases made through our links, at no extra cost to you. This helps us keep Gracie free and independent.

Acetyl Dipeptide-1 Cetyl Ester

+54 more