Loading...
Biodance Hydro Cera-nol Ampoule scores 8.6/9.8 vs Medicube Deep Vita C Ampoule at 7.7/9.8. Biodance Hydro Cera-nol Ampoule wins for hydration.
Biodance Hydro Cera-nol Ampoule edges ahead, winning 3 of 5 attributes.
Scores last verified: April 2026
25 unique
11 in common
26 unique
Where Biodance Hydro Cera-nol Ampoule really shines is hydration efficacy, scoring 9.8 compared to Medicube Deep Vita C Ampoule's 7.3. With Glycerin, Panthenol, and Butylene Glycol in its top ingredients, Biodance Hydro Cera-nol Ampoule delivers stronger moisture-binding capability.
Formulation Safety is another area of separation. Biodance Hydro Cera-nol Ampoule scores 9.0 here versus 8.0 for Medicube Deep Vita C Ampoule. That difference comes down to how each formula is built — the ingredient list tells the story.
Biodance Hydro Cera-nol Ampoule brings Niacinamide, Adenosine, and Allantoin as actives, while medicube Deep Vita C Ampoule relies on Ascorbic Acid, Glutathione, and Beta-Carotene. Both approaches have merit, but the positioning and supporting ingredients make the difference.
Biodance Hydro Cera-nol Ampoule is better if you have
Medicube Deep Vita C Ampoule is better if you have
Biodance Hydro Cera-nol Ampoule edges ahead with a slightly stronger formulation, but Medicube Deep Vita C Ampoule is still a solid pick.
Based on ingredient analysis, Biodance Hydro Cera-nol Ampoule scores higher overall. See the full score breakdown above for details on each attribute.
Yes, they share common ingredients. Check the ingredient face-off section above for a detailed comparison.
The key differences are in their active ingredients and formulation approach. Check the attribute battle above for a detailed breakdown.
Some links on this site are affiliate links. We may earn a commission from purchases made through our links, at no extra cost to you. This helps us keep Gracie free and independent.
© 2026 Gracie. All rights reserved. Data sourced from Open Beauty Facts (ODbL) and EU CosIng.