Avene Cicalfate + vs OleHenriksen Banana Bright+ Instant Glow Moisturizer
Head to head
VS
Loading...
OleHenriksen Banana Bright+ Instant Glow Moisturizer takes this one, winning 3 of 5 attributes.
18 unique
50 unique
Where OleHenriksen Banana Bright+ Instant Glow Moisturizer really shines is active ingredient strength, scoring 8.4 compared to Avene Cicalfate +'s 2.0. Its formula features Niacinamide, Ascorbic Acid, and Tocopherol in high positions, signalling meaningful concentrations.
Hydration Efficacy is another area of separation. OleHenriksen Banana Bright+ Instant Glow Moisturizer scores 8.8 here versus 5.5 for Avene Cicalfate +. That difference comes down to how each formula is built — the ingredient list tells the story.
OleHenriksen Banana Bright+ Instant Glow Moisturizer brings Niacinamide, Ascorbic Acid, and Tocopherol as actives, giving it an edge in targeted skincare benefits.
Avene Cicalfate + is better if you have
OleHenriksen Banana Bright+ Instant Glow Moisturizer is better if you have
OleHenriksen Banana Bright+ Instant Glow Moisturizer wins this comparison with a meaningfully stronger ingredient profile and overall score.
Based on ingredient analysis, OleHenriksen Banana Bright+ Instant Glow Moisturizer scores higher overall. See the full score breakdown above for details on each attribute.
Yes, they share common ingredients. Check the ingredient face-off section above for a detailed comparison.
The key differences are in their active ingredients and formulation approach. Check the attribute battle above for a detailed breakdown.
We may earn a commission from purchases made through our links, at no extra cost to you. This helps us keep Gracie free and independent.
Some links on this site are affiliate links. We may earn a commission from purchases made through our links, at no extra cost to you. This helps us keep Gracie free and independent.
© 2026 Gracie. All rights reserved. Data sourced from Open Beauty Facts (ODbL) and EU CosIng.