Loading...
Ole Henriksen Strength Trainer Peptide Boost Moisturizer scores 9.4/9.8 vs Avene Cicalfate+ Restorative Protective Cream at 6.4/9.8. Ole Henriksen Strength Trainer Peptide Boost Moisturizer wins for active ingredients.
Ole Henriksen Strength Trainer Peptide Boost Moisturizer takes this one, winning 3 of 5 attributes.
Scores last verified: April 2026
13 unique
66 unique
Where Ole Henriksen Strength Trainer Peptide Boost Moisturizer really shines is active ingredient strength, scoring 9.8 compared to Avene Cicalfate+ Restorative Protective Cream's 2.0. Its formula features Niacinamide, Acetyl Hexapeptide-1, and Acetyl Hexapeptide-8 in high positions, signalling meaningful concentrations.
Hydration Efficacy is another area of separation. Ole Henriksen Strength Trainer Peptide Boost Moisturizer scores 9.8 here versus 4.4 for Avene Cicalfate+ Restorative Protective Cream. That difference comes down to how each formula is built — the ingredient list tells the story.
Ole Henriksen Strength Trainer Peptide Boost Moisturizer brings Niacinamide, Acetyl Hexapeptide-1, and Acetyl Hexapeptide-8 as actives, while avene Cicalfate+ Restorative Protective Cream relies on Copper Sulfate, Aluminum Sucrose Octasulfate, and Arginine. Both approaches have merit, but the positioning and supporting ingredients make the difference.
Avene Cicalfate+ Restorative Protective Cream is better if you have
Ole Henriksen Strength Trainer Peptide Boost Moisturizer is better if you have
At mid-range pricing with a score of 6.4, Avene Cicalfate+ Restorative Protective Cream is a decent pick. Ole Henriksen Strength Trainer Peptide Boost Moisturizer sits at the premium level with a 9.4 score — the higher investment pays off in formulation quality.
Ole Henriksen Strength Trainer Peptide Boost Moisturizer wins this comparison with a meaningfully stronger ingredient profile and overall score.
Based on ingredient analysis, Ole Henriksen Strength Trainer Peptide Boost Moisturizer scores higher overall. See the full score breakdown above for details on each attribute.
Yes, they share common ingredients. Check the ingredient face-off section above for a detailed comparison.
The key differences are in their active ingredients and formulation approach. Check the attribute battle above for a detailed breakdown.
We may earn a commission from purchases made through our links, at no extra cost to you. This helps us keep Gracie free and independent.
Some links on this site are affiliate links. We may earn a commission from purchases made through our links, at no extra cost to you. This helps us keep Gracie free and independent.
© 2026 Gracie. All rights reserved. Data sourced from Open Beauty Facts (ODbL) and EU CosIng.