Loading...
Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 scores 8.4/9.8 vs AcM NC35 Studio Fix Fluid SPF 15 at 7.7/9.8. Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 wins for active ingredients.
Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 edges ahead, winning 2 of 5 attributes.
Scores last verified: April 2026
32 unique
6 in common
14 unique
Where Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 really shines is active ingredient strength, scoring 6.3 compared to AcM NC35 Studio Fix Fluid SPF 15's 2.0. Its formula features Centella Asiatica Extract, Niacinamide, and Madecassoside in high positions, signalling meaningful concentrations.
Formulation Safety is another area of separation. AcM NC35 Studio Fix Fluid SPF 15 scores 9.0 here versus 8.0 for Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30. That difference comes down to how each formula is built — the ingredient list tells the story.
Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 brings Centella Asiatica Extract, Niacinamide, and Madecassoside as actives, while acM NC35 Studio Fix Fluid SPF 15 relies on Laminaria Saccharina Extract, Algae Extract, and Tocopheryl Acetate. Both approaches have merit, but the positioning and supporting ingredients make the difference.
AcM NC35 Studio Fix Fluid SPF 15 is better if you have
Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 is better if you have
Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 comes in at premium pricing with a 8.4 score, which is solid value at that tier.
Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 edges ahead with a slightly stronger formulation, but AcM NC35 Studio Fix Fluid SPF 15 is still a solid pick.
Based on ingredient analysis, Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 scores higher overall. See the full score breakdown above for details on each attribute.
Yes, they share common ingredients. Check the ingredient face-off section above for a detailed comparison.
The key differences are in their active ingredients and formulation approach. Check the attribute battle above for a detailed breakdown.
We may earn a commission from purchases made through our links, at no extra cost to you. This helps us keep Gracie free and independent.
Some links on this site are affiliate links. We may earn a commission from purchases made through our links, at no extra cost to you. This helps us keep Gracie free and independent.
© 2026 Gracie. All rights reserved. Data sourced from Open Beauty Facts (ODbL) and EU CosIng.