Loading...
Paula's Choice Clinical 1% Retinol Treatment scores 8.9/9.8 vs SKIN1004 Madagascar Centella Hyalu-Cica Water-Fit Sun Serum SPF50+ at 7.6/9.8. Paula's Choice Clinical 1% Retinol Treatment wins for hydration.
Paula's Choice Clinical 1% Retinol Treatment takes this one, winning 3 of 5 attributes.
Scores last verified: April 2026
40 unique
7 in common
28 unique
Where Paula's Choice Clinical 1% Retinol Treatment really shines is hydration efficacy, scoring 9.8 compared to SKIN1004 Madagascar Centella Hyalu-Cica Water-Fit Sun Serum SPF50+'s 6.0. With Glycerin, Butylene Glycol, and Sodium Hyaluronate in its top ingredients, Paula's Choice Clinical 1% Retinol Treatment delivers stronger moisture-binding capability.
Active Ingredient Strength is another area of separation. Paula's Choice Clinical 1% Retinol Treatment scores 7.1 here versus 5.5 for SKIN1004 Madagascar Centella Hyalu-Cica Water-Fit Sun Serum SPF50+. That difference comes down to how each formula is built — the ingredient list tells the story.
Paula's Choice Clinical 1% Retinol Treatment brings Retinol, Palmitoyl Tetrapeptide-7, and Dipotassium Glycyrrhizate as actives, while sKIN1004 Madagascar Centella Hyalu-Cica Water-Fit Sun Serum SPF50+ relies on Niacinamide, Tocopheryl Acetate, and Adenosine. Both approaches have merit, but the positioning and supporting ingredients make the difference.
Paula's Choice Clinical 1% Retinol Treatment is better if you have
SKIN1004 Madagascar Centella Hyalu-Cica Water-Fit Sun Serum SPF50+ is better if you have
Both sit in the mid-range bracket, so value comes down to formulation quality. Paula's Choice Clinical 1% Retinol Treatment gets the nod here with its 8.9 overall score — you're getting more for a similar outlay.
Paula's Choice Clinical 1% Retinol Treatment wins this comparison with a meaningfully stronger ingredient profile and overall score.
Based on ingredient analysis, Paula's Choice Clinical 1% Retinol Treatment scores higher overall. See the full score breakdown above for details on each attribute.
Yes, they share common ingredients. Check the ingredient face-off section above for a detailed comparison.
The key differences are in their active ingredients and formulation approach. Check the attribute battle above for a detailed breakdown.
Some links on this site are affiliate links. We may earn a commission from purchases made through our links, at no extra cost to you. This helps us keep Gracie free and independent.
© 2026 Gracie. All rights reserved. Data sourced from Open Beauty Facts (ODbL) and EU CosIng.