Loading...
Ole Henriksen Strength Trainer Peptide Boost Moisturizer scores 9.4/9.8 vs Rhode Barrier Restore Cream at 8.5/9.8. Ole Henriksen Strength Trainer Peptide Boost Moisturizer wins for active ingredients.
Ole Henriksen Strength Trainer Peptide Boost Moisturizer edges ahead, winning 3 of 5 attributes.
Scores last verified: April 2026
53 unique
17 in common
6 unique
Where Ole Henriksen Strength Trainer Peptide Boost Moisturizer really shines is active ingredient strength, scoring 9.8 compared to Rhode Barrier Restore Cream's 6.4. Its formula features Niacinamide, Acetyl Hexapeptide-1, and Acetyl Hexapeptide-8 in high positions, signalling meaningful concentrations.
Hydration Efficacy is another area of separation. Ole Henriksen Strength Trainer Peptide Boost Moisturizer scores 9.8 here versus 9.0 for Rhode Barrier Restore Cream. That difference comes down to how each formula is built — the ingredient list tells the story.
Ole Henriksen Strength Trainer Peptide Boost Moisturizer brings Niacinamide, Acetyl Hexapeptide-1, and Acetyl Hexapeptide-8 as actives, while rhode Barrier Restore Cream relies on Niacinamide, Ceramide Np, and Ceramide Ap. Both approaches have merit, but the positioning and supporting ingredients make the difference.
Ole Henriksen Strength Trainer Peptide Boost Moisturizer is better if you have
Rhode Barrier Restore Cream is better if you have
At premium pricing with a score of 9.4, Ole Henriksen Strength Trainer Peptide Boost Moisturizer delivers strong value. Rhode Barrier Restore Cream sits at the mid-range level with a 8.5 score — the extra cost doesn't translate to better scores here.
Ole Henriksen Strength Trainer Peptide Boost Moisturizer edges ahead with a slightly stronger formulation, but Rhode Barrier Restore Cream is still a solid pick.
Based on ingredient analysis, Ole Henriksen Strength Trainer Peptide Boost Moisturizer scores higher overall. See the full score breakdown above for details on each attribute.
Yes, they share common ingredients. Check the ingredient face-off section above for a detailed comparison.
The key differences are in their active ingredients and formulation approach. Check the attribute battle above for a detailed breakdown.
We may earn a commission from purchases made through our links, at no extra cost to you. This helps us keep Gracie free and independent.
Some links on this site are affiliate links. We may earn a commission from purchases made through our links, at no extra cost to you. This helps us keep Gracie free and independent.
© 2026 Gracie. All rights reserved. Data sourced from Open Beauty Facts (ODbL) and EU CosIng.