Loading...
SKIN1004 Madagascar Centella Poremizing Fresh Cotton Pads scores 7.6/9.8 vs Neogen Dermalogy Bio-Peel Gauze Peeling Green Tea at 7.0/9.8. SKIN1004 Madagascar Centella Poremizing Fresh Cotton Pads wins for hydration.
SKIN1004 Madagascar Centella Poremizing Fresh Cotton Pads edges ahead, winning 2 of 5 attributes.
Scores last verified: April 2026
4 unique
7 in common
12 unique
Where SKIN1004 Madagascar Centella Poremizing Fresh Cotton Pads really shines is hydration efficacy, scoring 6.6 compared to Neogen Dermalogy Bio-Peel Gauze Peeling Green Tea's 4.7. With Butylene Glycol, Glycerin, and Dipropylene Glycol in its top ingredients, SKIN1004 Madagascar Centella Poremizing Fresh Cotton Pads delivers stronger moisture-binding capability.
Active Ingredient Strength is another area of separation. SKIN1004 Madagascar Centella Poremizing Fresh Cotton Pads scores 5.4 here versus 4.7 for Neogen Dermalogy Bio-Peel Gauze Peeling Green Tea. That difference comes down to how each formula is built — the ingredient list tells the story.
SKIN1004 Madagascar Centella Poremizing Fresh Cotton Pads brings Niacinamide, Allantoin, and Madecassoside as actives, while neogen Dermalogy Bio-Peel Gauze Peeling Green Tea relies on Glycolic Acid, Camellia Sinensis Leaf Extract, and Allantoin. Both approaches have merit, but the positioning and supporting ingredients make the difference.
Neogen Dermalogy Bio-Peel Gauze Peeling Green Tea is better if you have
SKIN1004 Madagascar Centella Poremizing Fresh Cotton Pads is better if you have
Both sit in the mid-range bracket, so value comes down to formulation quality. SKIN1004 Madagascar Centella Poremizing Fresh Cotton Pads gets the nod here with its 7.6 overall score — you're getting more for a similar outlay.
SKIN1004 Madagascar Centella Poremizing Fresh Cotton Pads edges ahead with a slightly stronger formulation, but Neogen Dermalogy Bio-Peel Gauze Peeling Green Tea is still a solid pick.
Based on ingredient analysis, SKIN1004 Madagascar Centella Poremizing Fresh Cotton Pads scores higher overall. See the full score breakdown above for details on each attribute.
Yes, they share common ingredients. Check the ingredient face-off section above for a detailed comparison.
The key differences are in their active ingredients and formulation approach. Check the attribute battle above for a detailed breakdown.
We may earn a commission from purchases made through our links, at no extra cost to you. This helps us keep Gracie free and independent.
Some links on this site are affiliate links. We may earn a commission from purchases made through our links, at no extra cost to you. This helps us keep Gracie free and independent.
© 2026 Gracie. All rights reserved. Data sourced from Open Beauty Facts (ODbL) and EU CosIng.