Loading...
SKIN1004 Madagascar Centella Poremizing Fresh Cotton Pads scores 7.6/9.8 vs MediHeal Tea Tree Trouble Pad at 7.1/9.8. SKIN1004 Madagascar Centella Poremizing Fresh Cotton Pads wins for hydration.
SKIN1004 Madagascar Centella Poremizing Fresh Cotton Pads edges ahead, winning 2 of 5 attributes.
Scores last verified: April 2026
5 unique
12 in common
7 unique
Where SKIN1004 Madagascar Centella Poremizing Fresh Cotton Pads really shines is hydration efficacy, scoring 6.6 compared to MediHeal Tea Tree Trouble Pad's 5.0. With Butylene Glycol, Glycerin, and Dipropylene Glycol in its top ingredients, SKIN1004 Madagascar Centella Poremizing Fresh Cotton Pads delivers stronger moisture-binding capability.
Active Ingredient Strength is another area of separation. SKIN1004 Madagascar Centella Poremizing Fresh Cotton Pads scores 5.4 here versus 4.9 for MediHeal Tea Tree Trouble Pad. That difference comes down to how each formula is built — the ingredient list tells the story.
SKIN1004 Madagascar Centella Poremizing Fresh Cotton Pads brings Niacinamide, Allantoin, and Madecassoside as actives, while mediHeal Tea Tree Trouble Pad relies on Niacinamide, Allantoin, and Centella Asiatica Extract. Both approaches have merit, but the positioning and supporting ingredients make the difference.
MediHeal Tea Tree Trouble Pad is better if you have
SKIN1004 Madagascar Centella Poremizing Fresh Cotton Pads is better if you have
At budget pricing with a score of 7.1, MediHeal Tea Tree Trouble Pad is a decent pick. SKIN1004 Madagascar Centella Poremizing Fresh Cotton Pads sits at the mid-range level with a 7.6 score — the higher investment pays off in formulation quality.
SKIN1004 Madagascar Centella Poremizing Fresh Cotton Pads edges ahead with a slightly stronger formulation, but MediHeal Tea Tree Trouble Pad is still a solid pick.
Based on ingredient analysis, SKIN1004 Madagascar Centella Poremizing Fresh Cotton Pads scores higher overall. See the full score breakdown above for details on each attribute.
Yes, they share common ingredients. Check the ingredient face-off section above for a detailed comparison.
The key differences are in their active ingredients and formulation approach. Check the attribute battle above for a detailed breakdown.
Some links on this site are affiliate links. We may earn a commission from purchases made through our links, at no extra cost to you. This helps us keep Gracie free and independent.
© 2026 Gracie. All rights reserved. Data sourced from Open Beauty Facts (ODbL) and EU CosIng.