Loading...
Ole Henriksen Strength Trainer Peptide Boost Moisturizer scores 9.4/9.8 vs henkel Fluor et plantes (sauge, mélisse, thym) at 6.7/9.8. Ole Henriksen Strength Trainer Peptide Boost Moisturizer wins for active ingredients.
Ole Henriksen Strength Trainer Peptide Boost Moisturizer takes this one, winning 3 of 5 attributes.
Scores last verified: April 2026
26 unique
67 unique
Where Ole Henriksen Strength Trainer Peptide Boost Moisturizer really shines is active ingredient strength, scoring 9.8 compared to henkel Fluor et plantes (sauge, mélisse, thym)'s 2.0. Its formula features Niacinamide, Acetyl Hexapeptide-1, and Acetyl Hexapeptide-8 in high positions, signalling meaningful concentrations.
Hydration Efficacy is another area of separation. Ole Henriksen Strength Trainer Peptide Boost Moisturizer scores 9.8 here versus 5.7 for henkel Fluor et plantes (sauge, mélisse, thym). That difference comes down to how each formula is built — the ingredient list tells the story.
Ole Henriksen Strength Trainer Peptide Boost Moisturizer brings Niacinamide, Acetyl Hexapeptide-1, and Acetyl Hexapeptide-8 as actives, while henkel Fluor et plantes (sauge, mélisse, thym) relies on Echinacea Purpurea Root Extract, Chamomilla Recutita Flower Extract, and Melissa Officinalis Leaf Extract. Both approaches have merit, but the positioning and supporting ingredients make the difference.
henkel Fluor et plantes (sauge, mélisse, thym) is better if you have
Ole Henriksen Strength Trainer Peptide Boost Moisturizer is better if you have
Ole Henriksen Strength Trainer Peptide Boost Moisturizer comes in at premium pricing with a 9.4 score, which is solid value at that tier.
Ole Henriksen Strength Trainer Peptide Boost Moisturizer wins this comparison with a meaningfully stronger ingredient profile and overall score.
Based on ingredient analysis, Ole Henriksen Strength Trainer Peptide Boost Moisturizer scores higher overall. See the full score breakdown above for details on each attribute.
Yes, they share common ingredients. Check the ingredient face-off section above for a detailed comparison.
The key differences are in their active ingredients and formulation approach. Check the attribute battle above for a detailed breakdown.
We may earn a commission from purchases made through our links, at no extra cost to you. This helps us keep Gracie free and independent.
Some links on this site are affiliate links. We may earn a commission from purchases made through our links, at no extra cost to you. This helps us keep Gracie free and independent.
© 2026 Gracie. All rights reserved. Data sourced from Open Beauty Facts (ODbL) and EU CosIng.