Loading...
Paula's Choice Clinical 1% Retinol Treatment scores 8.9/9.8 vs Drunk Elephant B-Hydra Intensive Hydration Serum at 7.8/9.8. Paula's Choice Clinical 1% Retinol Treatment wins for active ingredients.
Paula's Choice Clinical 1% Retinol Treatment takes this one, winning 3 of 5 attributes.
Scores last verified: April 2026
22 unique
8 in common
39 unique
Where Paula's Choice Clinical 1% Retinol Treatment really shines is active ingredient strength, scoring 7.1 compared to Drunk Elephant B-Hydra Intensive Hydration Serum's 4.2. Its formula features Retinol, Palmitoyl Tetrapeptide-7, and Dipotassium Glycyrrhizate in high positions, signalling meaningful concentrations.
Hydration Efficacy is another area of separation. Paula's Choice Clinical 1% Retinol Treatment scores 9.8 here versus 7.5 for Drunk Elephant B-Hydra Intensive Hydration Serum. That difference comes down to how each formula is built — the ingredient list tells the story.
Paula's Choice Clinical 1% Retinol Treatment brings Retinol, Palmitoyl Tetrapeptide-7, and Dipotassium Glycyrrhizate as actives, while drunk Elephant B-Hydra Intensive Hydration Serum relies on Ananas Sativus (Pineapple) Fruit Extract, Citrullus Lanatus (Watermelon) Fruit Extract, and Lens Esculenta (Lentil) Fruit Extract. Both approaches have merit, but the positioning and supporting ingredients make the difference.
Drunk Elephant B-Hydra Intensive Hydration Serum is better if you have
Paula's Choice Clinical 1% Retinol Treatment is better if you have
At premium pricing with a score of 7.8, Drunk Elephant B-Hydra Intensive Hydration Serum is a decent pick. Paula's Choice Clinical 1% Retinol Treatment sits at the mid-range level with a 8.9 score — the higher investment pays off in formulation quality.
Paula's Choice Clinical 1% Retinol Treatment wins this comparison with a meaningfully stronger ingredient profile and overall score.
Based on ingredient analysis, Paula's Choice Clinical 1% Retinol Treatment scores higher overall. See the full score breakdown above for details on each attribute.
Yes, they share common ingredients. Check the ingredient face-off section above for a detailed comparison.
The key differences are in their active ingredients and formulation approach. Check the attribute battle above for a detailed breakdown.
We may earn a commission from purchases made through our links, at no extra cost to you. This helps us keep Gracie free and independent.
Some links on this site are affiliate links. We may earn a commission from purchases made through our links, at no extra cost to you. This helps us keep Gracie free and independent.
© 2026 Gracie. All rights reserved. Data sourced from Open Beauty Facts (ODbL) and EU CosIng.