Loading...
Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 scores 8.4/9.8 vs Supergoop! Mineral Mattescreen SPF 40 at 6.4/9.8. Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 wins for hydration.
Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 takes this one, winning 3 of 5 attributes.
Scores last verified: April 2026
18 unique
17 unique
Where Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 really shines is hydration efficacy, scoring 8.9 compared to Supergoop! Mineral Mattescreen SPF 40's 4.5. With Glycerin, Butylene Glycol, and Panthenol in its top ingredients, Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 delivers stronger moisture-binding capability.
Active Ingredient Strength is another area of separation. Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 scores 6.3 here versus 2.0 for Supergoop! Mineral Mattescreen SPF 40. That difference comes down to how each formula is built — the ingredient list tells the story.
Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 brings Centella Asiatica Extract, Niacinamide, and Madecassoside as actives, while supergoop! Mineral Mattescreen SPF 40 relies on Hedychium Coronarium Root Extract and Tocopherol. Both approaches have merit, but the positioning and supporting ingredients make the difference.
Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 is better if you have
Supergoop! Mineral Mattescreen SPF 40 is better if you have
At premium pricing with a score of 8.4, Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 delivers strong value. Supergoop! Mineral Mattescreen SPF 40 sits at the mid-range level with a 6.4 score — the extra cost doesn't translate to better scores here.
Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 wins this comparison with a meaningfully stronger ingredient profile and overall score.
Based on ingredient analysis, Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 scores higher overall. See the full score breakdown above for details on each attribute.
Yes, they share common ingredients. Check the ingredient face-off section above for a detailed comparison.
The key differences are in their active ingredients and formulation approach. Check the attribute battle above for a detailed breakdown.
We may earn a commission from purchases made through our links, at no extra cost to you. This helps us keep Gracie free and independent.
Some links on this site are affiliate links. We may earn a commission from purchases made through our links, at no extra cost to you. This helps us keep Gracie free and independent.
© 2026 Gracie. All rights reserved. Data sourced from Open Beauty Facts (ODbL) and EU CosIng.