Loading...
Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 scores 8.4/9.8 vs Hada Labo Gokujyun UV White Gel SPF 50+ at 7.3/9.8. Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 wins for active ingredients.
Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 takes this one, winning 2 of 5 attributes.
Scores last verified: April 2026
13 unique
7 in common
20 unique
Where Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 really shines is active ingredient strength, scoring 6.3 compared to Hada Labo Gokujyun UV White Gel SPF 50+'s 2.0. Its formula features Centella Asiatica Extract, Niacinamide, and Madecassoside in high positions, signalling meaningful concentrations.
Hydration Efficacy is another area of separation. Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 scores 8.9 here versus 7.0 for Hada Labo Gokujyun UV White Gel SPF 50+. That difference comes down to how each formula is built — the ingredient list tells the story.
Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 brings Centella Asiatica Extract, Niacinamide, and Madecassoside as actives, giving it an edge in targeted skincare benefits.
Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 is better if you have
Hada Labo Gokujyun UV White Gel SPF 50+ is better if you have
At premium pricing with a score of 8.4, Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 delivers strong value. Hada Labo Gokujyun UV White Gel SPF 50+ sits at the budget level with a 7.3 score — the extra cost doesn't translate to better scores here.
Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 wins this comparison with a meaningfully stronger ingredient profile and overall score.
Based on ingredient analysis, Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 scores higher overall. See the full score breakdown above for details on each attribute.
Yes, they share common ingredients. Check the ingredient face-off section above for a detailed comparison.
The key differences are in their active ingredients and formulation approach. Check the attribute battle above for a detailed breakdown.
We may earn a commission from purchases made through our links, at no extra cost to you. This helps us keep Gracie free and independent.
Some links on this site are affiliate links. We may earn a commission from purchases made through our links, at no extra cost to you. This helps us keep Gracie free and independent.
© 2026 Gracie. All rights reserved. Data sourced from Open Beauty Facts (ODbL) and EU CosIng.